toroid balun winding

Home ] Up ]

 

Related articles at

Balun Test  contains model of "perfect" dipole currents.  

 Sleeve Balun shows how a sleeve adds impedance, useful for VHF and higher baluns

Receiving Common Mode Noise shows how lack of a balun can contribute to system noise (it applies to transmitting antennas as well)  

Longwires, Verticals, and Baluns shows how unbalanced antennas can have similar problems

Balun and Core selection for transformers and baluns

Transmitting baluns on testing transmitting baluns

 

Toroid Chokes and Baluns

Commonly published information tells us winding a choke or 1:1 balun on a toroid with this special winding technique increases common mode impedance (choking isolation) of an 11-turn balun on a pair of #65 material ferrite cores:

 

 

The common mode rejection sweep, assuming a 50-ohm common mode source and load is:

(pardon the camera jitter) 

  

 

This sweep shows the following suppression using split winding method:

15.71 MHz 37.1MHz 134.8MHz 157 MHz  
-33dB -46dB (peak performance) -19dB -3dB (minimum rejection)  

The same core was rewound using a normal parallel winding:

 

The sweep looked like this:

 

Common mode rejection, compared to the more complex winding, was:

 

Frequency 15.71 MHz 37.1MHz 134.8MHz 157 MHz
Split winding -33dB -46dB (peak performance) -19dB -3dB (minimum performance)
Normal winding -47dB (peak performance)  -41dB -4.6dB (minimum rejection) -11dB

 

Conclusion

Shunt capacitance is not always a bad thing! While the results vary with the core and number of turns, the more-difficult "split winding" will often just shift peak performance points higher in frequency. Performance in the HF range and lower could actually be decreased with the extra effort resulting in a poorer HF balun.

Common mode impedance, if the impedance is primarily inductive, increases when a slight amount of parallel capacitance is added. Shunt capacitance does not always, as is often claimed, reduce performance by "leaking" RF around a choke.

The rule is simple. With any parallel L and C (neglecting losses), impedance always increases unless the parallel capacitive reactance (in ohms) is less than half the value of the inductance (in ohms). With a choke winding impedance of j300 with an added parallel -j150 capacitive reactance, the combined impedance would be -j300. Impedance is the same value, only the sign changes! Any value of capacitive shunt reactance higher than -j150 (less capacitance value) would actually increase choke isolation!

There are many "improvements" we just blindly accept from reading articles, because on the surface they seem to make sense. This dispels one of the myths about baluns.

Another common myth is the widely accepted claim moving a choke balun to a lower common-mode impedance point of a circuit, such as the input of a tuner, improves balance or balun performance in the system. If you think baluns at the input of tuners are a good idea, go to this W7EL link  and read the section on current baluns. You might be surprised!