|
|
|
The following antenna is not a true Windom, but rather an off center fed or OCF dipole. After spending some time modeling the antenna this is the closest antenna I could find to a true multi-band dipole with reasonable SWR. It could be scaled for other bands.
Windom AntennasLoren G. Windom, ex- W8GZ, was instrumental in the development of the Windom antenna. Loren lived in Reynoldsburg, Ohio. Loren was originally 8ZO from Columbus, Ohio in 1922. His call is now reissued. The original concept was to off center feed a horizontal antenna so it [presented an impedance close to the surge impedance of a single wire line, or about 600 ohms. This would allow an inexpensive single conductor to be used as a feedline. In theory, by suitable selection of the feedpoint tap point and antenna length, a reasonable match would occur on multiple harmonically related bands. The Achilles heel of the original single wire Windom is the single wire feeder. The single wire feeder:
Later Generations of the WindomLater generation of the Windom are more correctly called off center fed dipoles (or in abbreviated form OCF dipole antennas). The problem with making a multiband OCF dipole is finding a sweet spot that presents a reasonable impedance on all amateur bands. As frequency increases the length of the antenna and offset of the feedpoint become critical. Along with critical length and feedline offset comes increased sensitivity to surroundings. Theory Behind The WindomEvery unterminated antenna has standing waves. In the context of standing waves, we actually are speaking of voltage and current distribution along the antenna. If we represent current levels with a line, a half-wave 3.5MHz dipole's current distribution looks like this:
Notice the offset feedpoint does not distort the distribution. The current is maximum at the center and minimum at the open ends. This means the feedpoint impedance is lowest at the center, and it increases towards the ends. The impedance is about 50-70 ohms at the center and very high (but not infinite) at the ends. By offsetting the feedpoint we can increase the feedpoint impedance. The same dipole operated on 14MHz (the 4th harmonic) shows four current peaks or low impedance points:
When there are multiple peaks in current, each current peak is less strong. The means the impedance at each low impedance point (current maximum) is higher. The end impedance is also lower! Notice in this case the dot representing the feedpoint was offset but very near the maximum.
Finally at 28MHz we have this:
Notice once again the feedpoint falls very near a current maxima. Now there are 8 maximum current points. With a 137-foot long antenna we have eight maximums. This is one maximum every 17 feet. An 8-1/2 foot move in antenna length or feedpoint location takes us from a maximum to a minimum! This means we have to be very careful with antenna dimensions and feedpoint location or we could miss the maxima. The Windom or OCF dipole is a balancing act. We must position the feedpoint and select the antenna length to place the feedpoint at or near a current maximum at every desired operating frequency! The higher the frequency the closer the feedpoint must be to the center of the current maxima on that band. A large error or offset can be tolerated on the lowest band, but not on the highest band. This is because current changes very fast with physical position on the highest band, and because maximum current levels are lower than on the lower bands. Slight adjustments in antenna length and feedpoint location affect the highest bands severely.
SWR Plot 80% Feedpoint OCF Dipole or WindomLike many people, I'd like to have one simple cheap antenna that handles 1500 watts, has a low SWR, and radiates efficiently on all primary HF bands. I spent a few hours of time modeling OCF dipole or two-wire feedline Windom antennas. This is the best combination I could find. Length: 137 feet of bare #14 to 16 AWG wire Height: As high and clear as possible Feedpoint: Located 80% from one end. 27.4 ft from one end. Here is an SWR sweep of this antenna:
As an alternative this antenna can be fed at the feedpoint with a good 4:1 current balun. Be careful doing this because many 4:1 current baluns are very poor designs. Some baluns advertised to be current baluns are not even current baluns! The following plot shows SWR using a good 4:1 current balun.
This provides a very useable antenna on 80,40,30,20,15,12, and 10 meters. The antenna is not particularly good where SWR exceeds 5:1. 60 and 17 meters are excluded from "good performance" bands. 66.7% Feedpoint WindomNote: This feedpoint offset gives up 30 meters. This is the primary reason I avoided the 1/3-2/3 feedpoint position and used the 80% feedpoint position. .The following 300 ohm plot shows 300 ohm feedline SWR. This is the SWR that would appear on a 300 twinlead feeder:
The 80% offset is better when using 300-450 ohm lines. The following 200 ohm SWR plot is for a Windom which is 1/3 and 2/3 offset, as shown in the ARRL Handbook. This is the SWR that would appear on a 200 ohm balun at the feedpoint:
c. W8JI 2006
.
|
|